Some Hot Buttons are just hotter than others.
As of this writing (Friday night) I've heard from over a hundred viewers who have written, called or nabbed me at restaurants or in the aisle at stores. They all want to talk about our "eyesores" editorial which aired Wednesday/Thursday of this week.
With only two exceptions (one poster who worried that our editorial might result in some owners tearing down their buildings, and my friend Luke Saucier who assumed the mantle of honorable opposition; he said he was just uncomfortable with how we're going about addressing blight), it seems the editorial really hit a nerve.
That's an understatement. I haven't had this kind of reaction to one of our Hot Buttons since our Macy*s "don't let the door hit you on the backside" editorial just after Christmas. I'm still getting high-fives (some figurative, some actual) from jilted female shoppers over that one. BTW thanks to my brother Dave for sending me this.
Most of the people I've heard from on the eyesores piece had a suggestion as to where we should start. The Charles Cinema gets mentioned a lot. Also the old One Hour Martinizing building near McNeese. But with a bullet, the one which has drawn the most ire is in the shadow of downtown, perched right on one of the city's most-traveled intersections. People are downright ANGRY over that one. I'd have to agree. It might as well be a poster child of the city's high-profile commercial eyesores, and has been such long before Rita ever came our way. If you don't know which building I'm talking about, stay tuned. If it's not cleaned up and repaired by Contraband Days, it will probably be at or toward the top of our "tell all" dance card.
If you would like to nominate an eyesore (for this exercise we're defining them as commercial structures which have been vacant for five years or more, are boarded up, have broken windows or graffiti which has been left to remain for a long time), just @mail me at hotbutton@kplctv.com. We're particularly interested in those buildings which are a thorn among roses; that is, the neighborhood surrounding them is vibrant, functional, and generally not blighted.
We really hope everyone cleans up their eyesores and we'll never actually have to name names, but if the owners continue to leave them the way they are now, we're ready and willing to bell some cats and shine a light on their real estate & tax records. As one poster put it, it's time to "spread the pride, not the decay."
One final note: several folks have told me the reply thread on the eyesores Hot Button is closed. They are correct. As the script in blue following the editorial advises, replies should be mailed to hotbutton@kplctv.com. There's a reason for this. When I do an editorial (or anytime I post a viewer commentary from someone other than myself) which may prompt personal attacks in response, I channel them through me first. That way nothing untoward gets posted. Usually I simply monitor the threads and edit or delete anything inappropriate. But in this case I'm asking anyone who wants to post a comment to send it to me so I can look at it before posting it. Don't let the "comments closed" note put the brakes on sharing your opinion!

















Recent Comments